Showing posts with label blogger confidential. Show all posts
Showing posts with label blogger confidential. Show all posts

Blogger Confidential: Rating Systems


Have you ever been faced with an issue while reading or blogging and thought: I wonder what other bloggers think about this?  No matter what genre or audience you blog for, we all face the same problems.  Are you a publisher or author wondering what goes on in a blogger's (and by extension a reader's) head?

Blogger confidential is a series of 12 questions asked to 11 bloggers about the nitty gritty details of blogging. Everything from what prompts a blogger to pick up a book, to what happens when a book doesn't live up to its hype.  This series was inspired by Wastepaper Prose's Author Insight series.

If you feel inspired by any of these questions, leave your answer in the comments, or create your own post!

This week's question:

Do you use a star rating system? What do you think the pros and cons are to using some sort of rating system to write reviews?

"I do not simply because then I feel like I'm comparing one book to another - is this book worth more stars than this book? - when the books aren't comparable at all. I recently joined Goodreads and I can't even give in to rating books there either. Too much stress!" Natasha from Maw Books

"I used to, now I don't. I figure if someone can read my review, they can figure out where my feelings lie on the enjoyment spectrum. It's an individual thing. I really have no feelings about star ratings at all. I don't look at them on other people's reviews but others love them. To each their own." Adele from Persnickety Snark

"I do use ratings. They're an easy way for me to "rank" my books (I'm kind of mildly obsessive and like lists, in case you didn't know, lol). And when I read others' reviews, I like when I can easily reference a rating. But I also have run into HUGE problems with them. Why do I feel like a lot of my 4-star books are my favorites? What makes a book a 5-star book? Should a stellar chick-lit-y book be ranked the same as a book that deals with deeper themes? If you have opinions on these things, you should let me know. I've been wondering about them for the past 6 months or so." Steph from Steph Su Reads

"I use a grading scale that ranges from A to D, but it’s the same idea as a star rating. The positive aspect of this type of rating is that it can be used for a quick reference and gives an overall, general opinion about the book. But, if a reader skips right to that rating, they’ll be missing out on a lot of important information. Looking only at the rating, you won’t know if the characteristics that bothered me are ones that will influence your opinion. For example, I like romantic tension and, if it’s missing, I might not favor the romance in the novel. If you prefer to jump into the relationship and skip the tension, you would most likely enjoy that aspect. You wouldn’t know that this pulled my rating down unless you’ve read my review." Sara from The Hiding Spot

"On my blog I use a five star rating system, but you can also rate the book
on my blog as well as a reader." Pam from Bookalicious

"A rating system is something that I have struggled with for a long time. In the very beginning, I did not use one, then for a few months, I did. Personally, for me, a rating system did not work. This is mainly due to me wanting to put my feelings just out there about the novel. I feel like my review tells my readers exactly how I feel about a certain novel, and sometimes a rating system can be overkill. I can see there being a lot of pro and cons to using this system, so my advice would be to try it if you are interested. The worse thing that could happen is you decide you do not like it." Kate from The Neverending Shelf

"I don’t. I did a poll not long ago on my site and, based on that feedback, I decided to continue with my ratings-less system. I write reviews. The meat is in the words themselves, not in a number. My reactions are not quantifiable and when I think about the blogs I trust and read faithfully, it’s the way that they write and the emotion they infuse into their reviews that grab me. Some of them rate, some of them don’t. But I decide whether or not to read the book based on what they say about it, not the number they assign it. Many readers skip a review entirely once they get a look at the rating. I don’t blame them at all. I do the same thing sometimes. But if I do that, then I’m missing the why. I’m missing the unique material that particularly reviewer brings to the table. Then I might as well just be trolling one of the big social reading forums (an activity I engage in regularly, but for a different purpose). Blog reviews are special because they bring more. It’s that more that I look for in other reviewers and it’s what I try to bring to my site every time I sit at my computer and type." Angie from Angieville

"The advantage to rating a book is that you have a concrete answer to how much you liked the book. But the problem with rating a book is that your opinion can change on what you'd rate it, depending on when you write the review. I think they're more helpful than detrimental, particularly for mostly positive reviews. For example, I rate books on a scale of 1 to 100 (I only go down to the 60s), and books that I LOVE get a 90-ish rating. There's a difference between a 92 and a 97, but that's hard to convey in writing. It's also easier to see how close a book got to being great if I rate it an 89. I think there are nuances you can indicate in a rating system, if you so choose." Trish from Hey Lady! Whatcha Reading?

"Yes, I use a rating out of 6 (because that's how many different chess pieces there are). I like the idea, because it gives people who don't necessarily want to read the entire review a quick look at how you felt. It can also give away how a blogger really feels about a book. Even if I say good things, if I give a book a 4 out of 6, you know it might have been pretty good, but not one of my favorites." Andye from Reading Teen

"Yes, I use a quarter star system. The pro for me is a concrete visual as to my overall enjoyment of the book. The cons are that people think you are trying to be objective and boxing a book in. Also, feelings about books can change over time. But that can also affect reviews." Amy from My Friend Amy

"Nope. On my personal site, There's A Book, I don't use a star system and instead of a "Recommendation" at the end of each review. It basically entails who I think the age group and what "type" of reader would enjoy the book the most. I find star ratings too constrictive and on the occasion that I have to "award" a star rating I'm generally very torn because of all the elements that go into making a book great." Danielle from There's a Book

Blogger Confidential: The Hardest Review


Have you ever been faced with an issue while reading or blogging and thought: I wonder what other bloggers think about this?  No matter what genre or audience you blog for, we all face the same problems.  Are you a publisher or author wondering what goes on in a blogger's (and by extension a reader's) head?

Blogger confidential is a series of 12 questions asked to 11 bloggers about the nitty gritty details of blogging. Everything from what prompts a blogger to pick up a book, to what happens when a book doesn't live up to its hype.  This series was inspired by Wastepaper Prose's Author Insight series.

If you feel inspired by any of these questions, leave your answer in the comments, or create your own post!

This week's question:


Which reviews are hardest for you to write? Reviews for books that were great, awful, or somewhere in between? Which are the easiest?

"I find reviews of books that I absolutely loved hardest to write. I end up saying the same things over and over, which really doesn’t equate to a helpful, meaningful review. I also babble when I’m excited, which makes the first drafts of those reviews terribly confusing and disjointed. Reviews of books that I didn’t like are easiest to write because I just pick out the characteristics that didn’t appeal to me. These reviews are generally shorter, which helps." Sara from The Hiding Spot

"The hardest reviews for me to write are for the books I couldn't stand, but had a connection in some way with the author. I like to be constructive, but I also don't like to sugar coat things. So, when these situations happen (they have a few times) it's difficult because I don't want the author to take what I say personally."

The easiest are usually the books in between and sometimes the one's I really liked. With a book that's just middle of the road, it's easy to pick out the pro's and con's with little struggle. Those reviews I can type up, let be and come back to when I'm just about to post and make sure everything looks how I want it to." Danielle from There's a Book

"Well, I would say the "somewhere in between" reviews are the hardest to come up with content for, but the awful ones are the hardest to press "publish" on! :) If I love a book, I can't wait to sit down and type out what I loved about it and share it with the world!" Andye from Reading Teen

"The hardest reviews to write are unquestionably the ones for books that reduce me to a sticky puddle of undying affection. For some reason it’s much harder to write a coherent review when my reaction is deliriously happy than when it is underwhelmed. When I sit down to analyze it, my mind naturally gravitates toward pinpointing what went wrong in the reading matchup that was me and that book. When nothing went wrong and everything was bliss, it’s harder to delineate the salient points that made the whole thing so great. That said, sometimes the words just flow and everything is in synch. I think it often depends on my frame of mind and what other distractions are calling my name. So I try to wait to write the review until I can give it the attention it deserves." Angie from Angieville

"The awesome books that I love and want everyone to read. Those are the hardest. How to write them without sounding gushy or fan-girly." Pam from Bookalicious

"I find it harder to write reviews for books I love. Gushing is for twitter, it doesn't belong in reviews....not much anyway. Sometimes everything falls into place and you love a book without being able to pinpoint specific reasons why. Easiest....plain awful writing. Then it becomes an issue of not sledgehammering the poor author." Adele from Persnickety Snark

"Books that are awesome are the easiest to write as well as books that are really awful. It's those ones that are somewhere in between that have me staring at the computer screen with a blank stare on my face." Natasha from Maw Books

"The reviews that are hardest to write are the ones where I loved the book. I get tongue tied and have fewer words to describe how much I loved the book. I often feel like I can't adequately describe my love, whereas it's pretty easy to describe my dislike or indifference. I guess this is why I use caps and italics and lots of exclamation points in reviews of books I love!" Trish from Hey Lady! Whatcha Reading?

"Honestly, the reviews that are the hardest to write are the ones that do not leave a lasting impression. I may have enjoyed parts, I may have disliked parts, but when it comes time to review, it is hard putting everything into words. The easiest are probably the ones that I dislike or did not finish. Generally, I find that I have a lot to say. But I want to make sure that when writing the review that I am respectful to the novel and its author, and try to find at least a few positives." Kate from The Neverending Shelf

"Reviews for mind-blowingly amazing books. How are you able to express your love for it without it digressing into a brainless rave? Without it sounding like every other review for an amazing book out there?" Steph from Steph Su Reads

"The somewhere in between books. Often these are the forgettable books and they make little personal impact. It's hard to come up with anything to say about them." Amy from My Friend Amy

Blogger Confidential: Bloggers as Aspiring Authors


Have you ever been faced with an issue while reading or blogging and thought: I wonder what other bloggers think about this?  No matter what genre or audience you blog for, we all face the same problems.  Are you a publisher or author wondering what goes on in a blogger's (and by extension a reader's) head?

Blogger confidential is a series of 12 questions asked to 11 bloggers about the nitty gritty details of blogging. Everything from what prompts a blogger to pick up a book, to what happens when a book doesn't live up to its hype.  This series was inspired by Wastepaper Prose's Author Insight series.

If you feel inspired by any of these questions, leave your answer in the comments, or create your own post!

This week's question:

There are bloggers who are aspiring authors. Do you feel like a blogger can also be actively pursuing a novel, or could it possibly burn bridges in the future by writing negative reviews?

"I think some bloggers can definitely write. They understand the market really well and from their critiquing understand what works in a narrative. I think there are issues in the professional relationship arena that could arise. But honesty should be appreciated. If their reviewing reflects a critical eye then why wouldn't a publisher want to sign them if their book is good?" Adele from Persnickety Snark

"I'm one of those bloggers! Sure, there's always the risk of running, in the future, into someone whose book you gave a critical review to. But you can't go into blogging thinking that, otherwise you won't be able to learn. One of the most commonly given advice to aspiring writers is that they read whatever they can get their hands on, even stuff they end up not enjoying. There's merit in figuring out what didn't work for you in those books as well. And if I ever meet an author whose work I reviewed critically, well... there's always the duck-and-run." Steph from Steph Su Reads

"I definitely think you could do both, if you can find the time that is. There are so many books to be reviewed that the occasional negative review won't hurt if done properly. There's no need to be rude in a review, even for a book you couldn't stand. If you offer constructive criticism and are honest in your reviews it's hard to believe you would be burning bridges. Besides, the amount of positive connections you make will far out-weigh the negative." Danielle from There's a Book

"I think there are good ways to write negative reviews. I don't see how the
two can't be separated. I have read some bits from some of the books and a
lot are really good fiction." Pam from Bookalicious

"That's an excellent question. It's possible that writing negative reviews might burn bridges. I know a lot of writers will only write about what they like and I think that's a fair way to do things." Amy from My Friend Amy

"Absolutely. As long as they do it in a respectful and professional way. I think a lot of time bloggers do not consider what they say and how it can affect how others see them. Like I said earlier, I write negative reviews. It does not happen that often, but it does happen. I feel like as long as you are honest with your feelings, but respectful to the author / publisher then there should be no problem. However, I do not work in the publishing world, so I am not completely sure on their take on this." Kate from The Neverending Shelf

"I guess a blogger who's an aspiring author could burn bridges by writing a negative review if they were a jerk about it, but the book industry, while being a small pond, is a big enough pond that this probably isn't an issue." Trish from Hey Lady! Whatcha Reading?

"Why not? There are some authors whose blogs I read religiously, but whose books are not particularly for me. And vice versa. Then there are some who are screamingly good at both and who awe me with their mad ability to write so prolifically and with such wit and skill. I don’t think anyone should stay away from writing or blogging because they’re afraid. Perceptive readers are able to sort out the differences between the two and will return over and over again to those they love." Angie from Angieville

"I think if I was an aspiring author, I would never write a negative review again. Thankfully I am not. It's hard enough as a blogger, knowing I may come face-to-face with an author, or just knowing that he/she might read my review and be hurt by it." Andye from Reading Teen

"I know there are a lot of authors out there who will not write negative reviews at all because they recognize the "friend factor." I'm not pursuing a novel, so I don't know. My gut tells me though that it's possible." Natasha from Maw Books

"I’m not one of those aspiring authors, but I feel like there is the potential for a negative impact. If your blog is relatively small, it probably won’t impact you. If you write negative reviews that are supported by valid points, it probably won’t impact you. If you write reviews that attack the author or publisher, you might have a problem." Sara from The Hiding Spot

Blogger Confidential: Never Say Never

Have you ever been faced with an issue while reading or blogging and thought: I wonder what other bloggers think about this?  No matter what genre or audience you blog for, we all face the same problems.  Are you a publisher or author wondering what goes on in a blogger's (and by extension a reader's) head?

Blogger confidential is a series of 12 questions asked to 11 bloggers about the nitty gritty details of blogging. Everything from what prompts a blogger to pick up a book, to what happens when a book doesn't live up to its hype.  This series was inspired by Wastepaper Prose's Author Insight series.

If you feel inspired by any of these questions, leave your answer in the comments, or create your own post!

This week's question:

Is there anything in blogging that you've done that you swore you'd never do? What changed your mind?

"Hmmm . . . nothing is coming to mind." Natasha from Maw Books

"Not so much with my actual blog, but I swore I’d never get a Twitter account. I never really saw the point, but now I spend entirely too much time on there! I only decided to make an account after I saw how beneficial it can be when spreading the word about new posts and connecting with fellow bloggers and authors." Sara from The Hiding Spot

"Posted every single day and stayed up very late to do so. I always said I wouldn't do this, "it's just a blog". Well, it's become more than that. It's a daily interaction with people who share my same thoughts and feelings about books. Which can often be hard to find in "real life". More than anything though, the reason behind it had more to do with a desire to share more. I've developed an insane addiction to children's and YA books that has me constantly thinking about new ways to talk about them, thus leading to my daily posting and late nights. But I love it!" Danielle from There's a Book

"I guess the only thing is keeping up with the blog and its community. I am really grateful to all my followers and readers, and so it hurts that I cannot comment or participate as much as I use to. It was not so much that my mind was changed, but rather that I got a job. For a majority of my blog's life, I have been 100% focused on it, but now with the job, it is SO hard sometimes to get everything done. I hate feeling like things are not getting taken care of." Kate from The Neverending Shelf

"I don’t think so, actually. But then I don’t go around swearing off things very much. Or at least not blogging things. I may never touch broccoli again after the Great Vomiting Incident of 2009, but that’s another story entirely and one not at all worth going into here. There are worlds that blogging has opened up to me that I am certain I would never have discovered otherwise and that is one of the reasons it has bewitched me so. For instance, I hadn’t formally sworn off anything, but I had never read a straight romance novel before I was challenged to do so by some blogfriends. That first one wasn’t so much a go, but I have since found a small near-handful that have worked for me just swimmingly. And I would never have found them without those wonderful romance readers and bloggers out there who make me laugh on a daily basis and wisely and deftly point me toward books that are made for Angie. When you read blogs centered around genres you don’t normally read, you discover the wonderfully smart, funny people who do read them and you find yourself irresistibly drawn to search out what they recommend. Because good book are good books. Period. No matter the genre." Angie from Angieville

"I don't think so... why, was there something on your mind when you asked this question? :)" Steph from Steph Su Reads

"I don't know if I've done things I swore I would never do, but I've definitely changed things. I went from no ratings to ratings and from no disclosure to disclosure. That's why conversation with other bloggers and people who do what you do can be so valuable and I think bloggers should always feel it's okay to change something that's not working for them." Amy from My Friend Amy


"I did a meme! I swore I never would I saw them as 'fillers' now I see that
some of them can be community building." Pam from Bookalicious

"I was asked by a reader not to talk about my follower numbers any more so I haven't. Until now. I don't think they mean anything, more often than not they represent a bloggers need to have competitions to look like a quality reviewer. Some bloggers have high numbers because they are THAT good. My numbers are relatively small which bums me out when I allow myself to get into a high school mentality of wanting to be prom queen. I've learnt that my followers mostly come by every single day. They are a loyal little bunch and I love them to bits. Would I like more? Yes. But that's a vanity thing." Adele from Persnickety Snark

"Ummm.....well....I did write a good review once for a book I wasn't crazy about because I had gotten too close to the author. I felt icky afterwards and swore to never do it again!" Andye from Reading Teen

"I've sworn that I would never lie about how I felt about a book, even if I'm friends with the author (and I've never done this). Admittedly, it's caused authors to cease contact with me after they read my review, but I'd rather be honest and lose a potential friend than lie or even not post a review (because I think not posting a review is akin to lying and is taking the cowardly way out)." Trish from Hey Lady! Whatcha Reading?

Blogger Confidential: Book Hype

Have you ever been faced with an issue while reading or blogging and thought: I wonder what other bloggers think about this?  No matter what genre or audience you blog for, we all face the same problems.  Are you a publisher or author wondering what goes on in a blogger's (and by extension a reader's) head?

Blogger confidential is a series of 12 questions asked to 11 bloggers about the nitty gritty details of blogging. Everything from what prompts a blogger to pick up a book, to what happens when a book doesn't live up to its hype.  This series was inspired by Wastepaper Prose's Author Insight series.

If you feel inspired by any of these questions, leave your answer in the comments, or create your own post!

This week's question:

Does a preconception of a book affect your review? Do you write a review differently if you feel a book doesn’t live up to the hype?
  
"Preconceptions definitely do affect my reviews, as does its genre. I think it's a natural part of human interaction: if the book leaves you feeling let-down and underwhelmed, that's going to be the tone of your review. If you close the book feeling pleasantly--or even ecstatically--surprised, same thing. I think that preconceptions are inevitable, even if you've heard absolutely nothing about the book before you read it. Even merely reading the jacket or back cover summary will give you certain assumptions or expectations. It can't be helped!" Steph from Steph Su Reads

"I stay away from the hype. I read reviews, and tweets after I read the book for myself." Pam from Bookalicious

"It does. Sometimes I won't like a book that everybody else seems to be raving about or else I'll love a book that receives a lot of negative reviews and I'll start to question my savviness as a reader in the first place. Questioning oneself about whether or not you’re a good reader is awful! I haven't written my review yet for Day for Night (didn't finish it) because I keep thinking that maybe one day I'll come back and finish it to see what they hype was as I just wasn't getting it. If I think a book didn't live up to the hype I'll usually just say so." Natasha from Maw Books

"I don’t think I write the review differently, but I will certainly acknowledge that I was aware of the hype and that—for me—it didn’t live up to it. But the way I go about writing the review remains the same. I talk about how I heard about it and where I ran across it, I write a spoiler-free summary, and then go into my reaction, what I thought of it, and why." Angie from Angieville

"I try not to get caught up in hype surrounding books I have for review because I’ve found that it definitely has the power to skew my opinion. Sometimes I’ll actively seek out reviews, both positive and negative, so I have a well-rounded preconception. There are also times when I’ll wait a few days before writing my review so I can look past my preconceptions and analyze the novel for what it was, not what I wanted it to be." Sara from The Hiding Spot

"If I feel the opposite of what the general YA blogging consensus feels then I definitely go harder and ensure I am more exact in my reasoning. I've read two books that have lived up to the hype in the past 2 years, the rest have fallen by the wayside. I always start reading a book with optimism but it doesn't take long for reality to hit. Of late I have taken to asking a few trusted bloggers if a book is worth my time because I hate being disappointed. That being said, when hype for a new release is based solely on cover art and an author's online manoeuvrings then I am very wary." Adele from Persnickety Snark

"Sometimes, if a book "claims" to be one thing, but ends up being completely different, I can get irritated and end up not liking it. I tend to have different moods as far as books go. Sometimes I'm in the mood for romance, sometimes fantasy etc. If a book claims to be paranormal, then ends up basically a high school drama, it gets on my nerves!" Andye from Reading Teen

"I actually try not to read too many reviews before I sit down to read or write the review for this very reason. Of course I find books based on reviews I read, but I honestly have a slightly poor memory when it comes to reading those. Thus the reason for my "wish list". I have had a situation where the book did not live up to the hype and it was pretty difficult to remove myself from that impression without some effort." Danielle from There's A Book

"I would not say that my preconception affects my review, but rather how I look at the novel in general. There have been numerous novels that I have heard glowing things about, but when I read it, I am not too impressed. If the novel does not live up to my expectations, it does not effect how I write the review. However, I will from time to time comment on my expectations in the review. I feel like for certain novels this can be important to the review. But I always make sure that when doing this that I explain what I was expecting and how it did not live up to expectation X. I feel like if I do not give that full explanation I am doing myself, my readers, and the novel / the author a great disservice. I whole heartily believe in honest reviewing, but sometimes it is necessary to fully explain what you were looking for." Kate from The Neverending Shelf

"Yes. My reviews are really my reactions to books. If a book is hyped there is no way for me to stand apart from all that hype...it's part of the reason why I chose to read the book and my overall experience with it. If I don't like it, I will still try to discuss the merits of the book, but the story of a book in one's life begins before you read it and doesn't end even with a review, really. So I think it's hard to completely divorce yourself from your expectations. Additionally, most readers of book blogs are looking to increase the discussion of their reading material in their lives and keeping your reviews personal is one way of doing that." Amy from My Friend Amy

"No, I don't think preconception of a book affects my review. What is hype, anyway? A bunch of people who like something and talk about it? So if that's what hype is, then it's not *that* much different than if a friend recommended a book. I guess if people feel there's hype, then there's a certain amount of peer pressure to like a book, but I don't feel that I *have* to like a book. I like it or I don't. I recently reviewed a very popular book that I really didn't like, but that most people seem to like. So when I posted my review, I thought I'd get a bunch of people saying, Sorry you didn't like it, but I did. What I actually got was a ton of people who came out of the woodwork saying they didn't like it either." Trish from Hey Lady! Whatcha Reading?